#020 Chris Smith | Finding happiness at work
16 June 2022 · 26 min · as at 2022-06-16
Petro du Pisani (host) · Chris Smith (guest)
Listen to the episode on iono.fm · MP3
About the guest
Chris Smith
Freelance Consultant in Project and Business Management
Engineer by training who studied at UCT, graduating in 2005, and worked for one company for 13 years; fellow UCT EMBA student whose research focused on improving happiness at work.
In Chris's own words:
“I am an engineer by training. I studied at UCT, graduated in 2005. And since then, I've worked for one, company that's gone through a couple of different owners.”
Guest details come from the published episode notes or the guest's own words in the episode.
Episode analysis
Analysis by AI, drawn only from this episode; every point links to the moment it rests on.
Petro du Pisani talks with fellow UCT EMBA student Chris Smith about his dissertation, Improving Happiness at Work, What Leaders Can Do and Why They Should Do It. Chris, an engineer by training, explains what prompted the topic and how he combined design science with phenomenology in about twenty-two interviews. He sets out his findings: the experiences people described were eudaimonic rather than hedonic, purpose and authenticity mattered most, and the direct manager had a strong influence. He also found that uncertainty drove unhappiness. The conversation ends with how the EMBA changed him, including the Viktor Frankl idea of hinge moments.
Key ideas
- Chris reports that every workplace experience interviewees described was eudaimonic rather than hedonic; nobody cited a raise or promotion, and rewards mattered for recognition. [05:45]▸ [12:16]▸ [12:44]▸ [12:44]▸
- Chris found purpose and authenticity to be the most dominant drivers of happiness at work, especially when personal purpose aligned with the company's purpose. [11:03]▸ [13:09]▸ [21:54]▸
- Chris argues the direct relationship between a manager and their reports is crucial and can overshadow unhappiness with other parts of the organisation. [15:07]▸ [15:20]▸ [15:38]▸ [15:40]▸
- Chris found that money does not compensate for unhappiness: interviewees left for lower-paying jobs or for no job at all. [13:41]▸ [13:41]▸
- Chris identifies uncertainty as the factor behind almost all unhappy experiences and argues leaders should be upfront, honest and transparent. [21:22]▸ [22:25]▸ [22:25]▸ [22:34]▸
- Chris holds that organisations are human-designed and therefore improvable, drawing on Herbert Simon's science of the artificial. [06:53]▸ [07:32]▸ [07:44]▸
- Chris argues that because people take work home, improving happiness at work improves happiness in life. [17:55]▸ [18:00]▸
Design science research framework (as Chris used it)
- Assess the problem
- Define the problem
- Look at various options to improve it
- Test those options
As described in the episode: [06:53]▸ [07:53]▸
Lessons
- Chris suggests leaders help direct reports understand their purpose and how it aligns with the organisation's purpose. [13:09]▸ [15:20]▸
- Chris argues newly appointed managers, often promoted for technical skill, should be trained in the relationship side of leading a team. [16:12]▸ [16:14]▸ [17:10]▸
- In uncertain times, Chris advises leaders to admit they lack all the answers, lay out scenarios, and commit to helping staff through whatever happens. [23:34]▸ [23:34]▸ [24:04]▸
- Chris describes learning to catch the pause between stimulus and response and choosing a different reaction. [20:23]▸ [20:34]▸ [21:04]▸
- Chris says the most valuable lesson of his EMBA was that understanding organisations requires understanding yourself. [02:42]▸ [02:46]▸
Who it's for
Managers, team leaders and HR or people professionals who want evidence on what makes employees happy at work, and prospective EMBA students or researchers interested in phenomenology and design science as qualitative research methods.
Facts stated in the episode
- Chris graduated in engineering from UCT in 2005 and worked 13 years with the same company. [01:00]▸ [01:29]▸
- The dissertation title was Improving Happiness at Work, What Leaders Can Do and Why They Should Do It. [04:56]▸
- Chris conducted about twenty-two interviews, with each person describing two to four experiences. [11:03]▸
- Chris identified around seven human emotions and about 20 types of experiences contributing to them. [12:48]▸
- Chris ran his literature review throughout the six months he spent writing the paper. [05:12]▸
Questions this episode answers
- Does paying people more make them happier at work?According to Chris's interviews, no. Nobody described a raise or promotion as a happy moment; rewards mattered as recognition. Where people were unhappy, pay did not matter, and some left for lower-paying jobs or no job. [12:16]▸ [12:44]▸ [13:41]▸
- What is the biggest driver of happiness at work?Chris found purpose and authenticity were the most dominant: people whose purpose aligned with the company's purpose were more motivated and happier. [13:09]▸ [21:54]▸
- How much does a manager affect employee happiness?Chris says the direct relationship between a manager and their reports is crucially important and can overshadow unhappiness with other factors. Petro adds the saying that people leave managers, not organisations. [15:07]▸ [15:20]▸ [15:38]▸
- What makes employees most unhappy at work?Chris found uncertainty behind almost all unhappy experiences described. He advises leaders to be upfront, honest and transparent even about unpleasant news. [22:25]▸ [22:34]▸
- What is the difference between eudaimonic and hedonic happiness?Chris describes eudaimonic happiness as a continuous journey of realising your talents and using them for the greater good. Hedonic happiness is linked to immediate pleasure and satisfaction. [05:45]▸
- How should leaders communicate when the future is uncertain?Chris says leaders need not have all the answers. They should be confident there is a way out, explain what they are preparing for in each scenario, and promise to help people through it. [23:34]▸ [24:04]▸
- What research methods did Chris use to study happiness at work?He used a design science framework: assess and define the problem, consider options, test them. He added phenomenology, interviewing about twenty-two people about happy and unhappy work experiences. [06:53]▸ [07:53]▸ [08:16]▸ [11:03]▸
- Why is it good business to invest in employee happiness?Chris says the literature, confirmed by his interviews, shows happy employees are more motivated. They are absent less, stay longer and go out of their way for the organisation. [11:14]▸ [11:35]▸
In their own words
Longer stretches of the conversation, word for word from the transcript, turn by turn.
The family dinner that sparked the research topic
Note (AI): Chris explains the personal observation of frustrated professionals that drove both his EMBA and his choice of happiness at work as a research topic.
Chris Smith, guest · [03:26]So I, I think I may have told you the story before. I went to dinner once, probably about eight years ago or nine years ago when I was in Joburg with staying with some family, and the rest of the family at the table and I, all discussing our work, it just hit me suddenly that all of us were doing a career that we'd studied for, that we …
Read the full passage (335 words, 03:26–04:53)
Chris Smith, guest · [03:26]So I, I think I may have told you the story before. I went to dinner once, probably about eight years ago or nine years ago when I was in Joburg with staying with some family, and the rest of the family at the table and I, all discussing our work, it just hit me suddenly that all of us were doing a career that we'd studied for, that we wanted to be doing. You know, we were accountants and In insurance, and I was an engineer, and we were all working for companies that were making a bit of a difference. You know, no one was doing anything terrible. The companies weren't unethical. And we each had a fair bit of autonomy in our, in our jobs. We weren't at the lowest rung. And yet we were all incredibly frustrated by our organization. We all wanted to see our organizations do better. And yet we all felt misheard or, you know, not understood, and just frustrated in, in what we were doing. And it just struck me that surely there must be a better way for employees to feel, not only for ourselves that we, you know, in regards to the dinner, we're not griping about our job, but also for organizations. Surely we would be better in our organizations, more effective and more motivated if we were feeling positive about it instead of seeing all this negativity. So that is actually one of the things, that also one of the factors that made me want to do the EMBA was, you know, is there a way to make organizations better, whether it's my current one or, or other ones? and then, you know, I was When it came to my study topic, they said, choose something close to your heart. And so I was a little bit worried that I was veering into sociology, but I, I stuck with it and, and definitely I think it's, it's, been a, an interesting business topic.
Design science and phenomenology as research method
Note (AI): Explains how Chris combined Herbert Simon's design science with phenomenology to study individual experiences of happiness at work.
Chris Smith, guest · [06:53]So I, I was struck during the course, you, you mentioned other things that came out during the course, and, and I'm dancing a little bit around in my answers, but There were so many things that popped up during the course that I wanted to explore further, and, one of those was design science, which is kind of based on the premise that the world consists of natural, phenomena …
Read the full passage (367 words, 06:53–08:54)
Chris Smith, guest · [06:53]So I, I was struck during the course, you, you mentioned other things that came out during the course, and, and I'm dancing a little bit around in my answers, but There were so many things that popped up during the course that I wanted to explore further, and, one of those was design science, which is kind of based on the premise that the world consists of natural, phenomena and artificial elements, which are created or designed by humans. And an artificial element can be made up of natural parts, so like, Kirstenbosch National Botanical Garden in Cape Town is made up of natural plants and trees, but the design of it is, is human. It's laid out by humans, with a particular design. So the science of the artificial world, which was introduced, by Herbert Simon, says that, you know, we can, it's human designed, and so humans can improve it. And I see organizations as that, you know, humans create organizations, and therefore humans can improve organizations. So I started with the design science framework, which Is a fairly broad framework. It's not a very tight research methodology, but it gives a, an outline of kind of assessing the problem, defining the problem, and then looking at various options to improve it, and then testing those options. So when I started with the interviews, I realized that this was an incredibly, human phenomenon that I was trying to study this happiness, and really the definition of happiness that mattered for each interview was the individual's understanding of happiness. And so I decided to use a, a, an approach called phenomenology, which is a bit of a philosophy and a research methodology, and it entails interviewing people or interviewing texts and trying to understand the, the real essence of an experience, that occurs before somebody interprets it and, and describes it, which is difficult because you're trying to understand that through the interpretation and the description of the, the individual that has described it. But basically through the interviews then, I wanted to understand the real life happenings at work that made people feel happy or feel unhappy, and, so that those could be repeated.
Core findings from twenty-two interviews
Note (AI): The main findings: interviews matched the literature, eudaimonic over hedonic experiences, purpose alignment, and money not compensating for unhappiness.
Chris Smith, guest · [11:03]And I did about twenty-two interviews, each person described sort of two to four experiences, happy and unhappy. And what was amazing for me was how their personal accounts matched the literature. So the literature said to me that happy employees are more motivated. they are absent less. They want to stay with the organization more. They'll go out of their way to work more for the organization. money becomes …
Read the full passage (560 words, 11:03–14:04)
Chris Smith, guest · [11:03]And I did about twenty-two interviews, each person described sort of two to four experiences, happy and unhappy. And what was amazing for me was how their personal accounts matched the literature. So the literature said to me that happy employees are more motivated. they are absent less. They want to stay with the organization more. They'll go out of their way to work more for the organization. money becomes less important, you know, financial reward. And I found exactly that in the interviews through very personal, descriptions. So one interviewee said to me, you know, in a previous job where they weren't very happy, they would take the odd sick day when they weren't quite sick. You know, and that's absenteeism in a very personal human expression. And, and she said, you know, in her job now, she will work on weekends, without being paid. She just wants to see the organization succeed. So that was, the, one of the most, amazing things or one of the most sort of beneficial things, I think, for my research was to, to prove that although I'm looking at human, employee happiness, it really does have better benefits to organizations and leaders should invest in it. And then the other interesting thing was how of those, say, eighty or a hundred experiences that were described, Every single one of them was a more eudaimonica type experience than a hedonic happiness. So nobody told me that they were happy one day when they got a huge raise or when they got a big promotion. Some people did say to me that they were happy that their company gives raises, incrementally, and bases it on their, their achievements during that quarter or during that, half a year. So, yeah, it wasn't the financial, the financial reward didn't make them happy for the financial sake, it was for the recognition. So I came up with around seven human emotions that we want to have met and about 20 odd sort of experiences, type of experiences that contribute to those emotions. And, the, probably the biggest emotion or most, the, the emotion that was affected most and affected happiness most was purpose and authenticity. Where people, again, tied to your demonic experience of happiness, where people felt that their purpose was aligned with the company's purpose, and that what they were doing each day was aligned with that purpose and, and furthering the interests of the company. they were much more motivated at work, they were much happier at work. They, they got an additional level of happiness beyond just doing a good job, and enjoying the, the parts of the job. And some of the other, there were so many insights, we could spend a few hours talking about this, this, this topic. But, another one was how, where people are unhappy, it doesn't actually matter how much money you, you pay them. people that I spoke to left jobs to go to lower-paying jobs, they left jobs to go to no job, they moved back in with their parents because they didn't have a job, and they just couldn't handle being unhappy at work. So I think those were two of the, the, the most amazing, things, but I'll, I'll come back to some more later if I, if they come back to me.
Why new managers need training in the soft side
Note (AI): Chris argues that promoted technical experts are rarely trained in relationships, and sets out newer managers as his entry point for applying the research.
Chris Smith, guest · [16:12]So I'm thinking that, you know, many organizations, leaders kind of are just chosen from individuals within the organization, not necessarily based on leadership capability or leadership skills, but because they've either been there longest or because they're the best accountant or best engineer. And often those people are put in a position where they are now managing a team, and then that's it. And, you know, what the company …
Read the full passage (356 words, 16:12–18:04)
Chris Smith, guest · [16:12]So I'm thinking that, you know, many organizations, leaders kind of are just chosen from individuals within the organization, not necessarily based on leadership capability or leadership skills, but because they've either been there longest or because they're the best accountant or best engineer. And often those people are put in a position where they are now managing a team, and then that's it. And, you know, what the company often cares about is the performance of that team, as accountants or as engineers, and they don't look at the soft side. And what came out, through what I've spoken about, through the eudaimonic experiences that people spoke about, through the actions of the leaders, through that purpose, is that it goes beyond the, you know, the day-to-day tasks of accountants or lawyers and how they do the job, the relationships they form at work while they're doing the job become incredibly important. And so leaders, when they're put in that position, need to be trained on how to develop that, and often I feel they don't. So while I'd like to talk immediately to CEOs and change massive organizations, I think the first entry point for me is looking at, recent managers and training them on just making them aware, yeah, there are things that I really wasn't aware of that affect people's happiness at work. that I became aware of through this, that I can teach people and help them to engage with their, direct reports or employees or team members, more effectively, understand them better, and help them to be better employees. You mentioned, about how leaders have an impact on life, and, you know, it's also always struck me, you know, for, for years we know we spend most of our waking hours at work, and what happens at work, yeah, we take home. We're, we're not robots. And so if, if you have a bad day at work, you take it home on your family, to your kids, to your, to your partner. and so by improving people's happiness at work, we actually really can be improving people's happiness in life.
Mediating emotions and leading through uncertainty
Note (AI): Lists the emotions employees seek, identifies uncertainty as the main driver of unhappiness, and describes how leaders can communicate honestly when outcomes are unclear.
Chris Smith, guest · [21:22]So I think one thing I just wanted to mention was when we were discussing Some of the findings, and I was overwhelmed with a couple of them, like the fact that people really remember the, the big long-term experiences, eudaimonic happiness rather than hedonic immediate pleasure, and the power of purpose in their lives and the power of leaders. I think one of the biggest, sort of interesting findings …
Read the full passage (584 words, 21:22–24:15)
Chris Smith, guest · [21:22]So I think one thing I just wanted to mention was when we were discussing Some of the findings, and I was overwhelmed with a couple of them, like the fact that people really remember the, the big long-term experiences, eudaimonic happiness rather than hedonic immediate pleasure, and the power of purpose in their lives and the power of leaders. I think one of the biggest, sort of interesting findings that came out of the study was that we've got these, what I'd labeled, mediating emotions, which is what people are kind of seeking to, to meet. And so those I found were, they want authenticity, in themselves and in their leaders. They detect very quickly if a leader is, or an organization is not authentic, and they want purpose, as, as I mentioned. And then they also, they want to feel supported. they want to feel trusted by their, their superiors and by their organizations. they want to feel valued, and, they want to feel appreciated. There was an opportunity for growth, not just in their career, but in their personal sort of skills, and development as well. And then the one thing that really caused unhappiness across almost all the unhappy experiences that, that were described to me was uncertainty. People don't like uncertainty. And so as leaders, even if there's something unpleasant, if we can be upfront about it, And honest and transparent with, with our organizations, with our employees, with our suppliers, customers, everyone, then really that can remove a lot of unhappiness. So that is, that was for me quite interesting.
Petro du Pisani, host · [22:50]Yeah, I mean, in the last two years have been very uncertain. So how do you remain or provide some sort of certainty in an environment in a world that's really uncertain at this point in time? Although I don't think it's going to get any more certain going into the future. it's sort of probably creating those little islands of sanity that Chris Breen talked about, you know, within a very, very uncertain world, how do we create some sort of island of sanity within the organization that we're working in so that people can feel valued and, and purposeful, in what they're doing?
Chris Smith, guest · [23:23]I, I think so. I think as, as leaders, If, if we can provide confidence in uncertainty and also help, and I think that's something that leaders have actually been learning, that, that, yeah, the world has been changing the last two years and showing that leaders don't, don't need to be right all the time. They don't need to have all the answers all the time. But if they can be confident that there will be a way out of this, that they are working to find a way out of this and with the, with the team members to find a way out of it, and saying that it's okay to be a bit uncertain, to be anxious in the uncertainty, that is natural. And because I think that what happens with anxiety and uncertainty is it becomes a downward spiral as well, and then you, you kind of get lost. And so if you just have somebody saying, we're not certain, it could go either way, this is what we're preparing for in case it goes this way, this is what we're looking at in case it goes that way, and whatever way it goes, we will help you through it. I think that's all we as leaders can do.
Quotes
“we need to understand ourselves if we want to understand organizations and have influence in organizations.”
“humans create organizations, and therefore humans can improve organizations.”
“there are things that we almost can't experience because we don't have the words to explain what we're experiencing.”
“the financial reward didn't make them happy for the financial sake, it was for the recognition.”
“where people are unhappy, it doesn't actually matter how much money you, you pay them.”
“people don't leave organizations, they leave their managers.”
“by improving people's happiness at work, we actually really can be improving people's happiness in life.”
“between a stimulus and response, there's a pause, and in that pause lies our opportunity to choose our response, and in that choice lies our opportunity for growth.”
“the one thing that really caused unhappiness across almost all the unhappy experiences that, that were described to me was uncertainty.”
“leaders don't, don't need to be right all the time. They don't need to have all the answers all the time.”
What was said, by topic
EMBA learning journey
“I am an engineer by training. I studied at UCT, graduated in 2005. And since then, I've worked for one, company that's gone through a couple of different owners.”
“I'd been in with the same company for 13 years, and I needed to either, if I was going to stay with the company, be able to bring in some new ideas or take new ideas elsewhere and see what else was out there.”
“but I think that's, that's really the, the most valuable lessons I got out of it was, yeah, we need to understand ourselves if we want to understand organizations and have influence in organizations.”
“It's really made me question how I experience things. I mean, really up to a deep level, and it's almost provoked a bit of anxiety sometimes because the world that I was kind of existing in and operating in is not the real world.”
“I think, but one of the messages that came through for me quite strongly as a result of the, the course is the whole concept around hinge moments.”
“one of the quotes that I most remember ever writing down was a quote by Viktor Frankl that Chris Green, mentioned, which was about the hinge moments. About how between a stimulus and response, there's a pause, and in that pause lies our opportunity to choose our response, and in that choice lies our opportunity for growth.”
“So, you know, learning to recognize those moments and then having the, the will to, to change my response.”
Happiness at work
“And yet we were all incredibly frustrated by our organization. We all wanted to see our organizations do better. And yet we all felt misheard or, you know, not understood, and just frustrated in, in what we were doing.”
“Surely we would be better in our organizations, more effective and more motivated if we were feeling positive about it instead of seeing all this negativity.”
“My title was ultimately Improving Happiness at Work, What Leaders Can Do and Why They Should Do It.”
“Eudaimic, eudaimonic happiness, which is where you see happiness as like an end goal of a continuous journey, potentially a life journey, of realizing what are your talents and how can you use them most effectively to the greater good. And then hedonic happiness, which is more linked to immediate pleasure and immediate satisfaction.”
“a lot of research is focused on the negative sort of feelings, in health and it in the workplace. And then when they started looking at positive feelings at work, they were more interested in the positive outcomes, so engagement, job satisfaction, things that really matter more to the company,”
“And I did about twenty-two interviews, each person described sort of two to four experiences, happy and unhappy. And what was amazing for me was how their personal accounts matched the literature.”
“So the literature said to me that happy employees are more motivated. they are absent less. They want to stay with the organization more. They'll go out of their way to work more for the organization. money becomes less important, you know, financial reward.”
“So one interviewee said to me, you know, in a previous job where they weren't very happy, they would take the odd sick day when they weren't quite sick. You know, and that's absenteeism in a very personal human expression.”
“Every single one of them was a more eudaimonica type experience than a hedonic happiness. So nobody told me that they were happy one day when they got a huge raise or when they got a big promotion.”
“the financial reward didn't make them happy for the financial sake, it was for the recognition.”
“So I came up with around seven human emotions that we want to have met and about 20 odd sort of experiences, type of experiences that contribute to those emotions.”
“where people are unhappy, it doesn't actually matter how much money you, you pay them. people that I spoke to left jobs to go to lower-paying jobs, they left jobs to go to no job, they moved back in with their parents because they didn't have a job,”
“if you have a bad day at work, you take it home on your family, to your kids, to your, to your partner. and so by improving people's happiness at work, we actually really can be improving people's happiness in life.”
“And I think just by engaging with others, we can get a lot more of that positivity and happiness back in our lives.”
Phenomenology research methods
“So I did literature review throughout the whole assignment, through the six months that I was putting the paper together.”
“So the science of the artificial world, which was introduced, by Herbert Simon, says that, you know, we can, it's human designed, and so humans can improve it. And I see organizations as that, you know, humans create organizations, and therefore humans can improve organizations.”
“It's not a very tight research methodology, but it gives a, an outline of kind of assessing the problem, defining the problem, and then looking at various options to improve it, and then testing those options.”
“And so I decided to use a, a, an approach called phenomenology, which is a bit of a philosophy and a research methodology, and it entails interviewing people or interviewing texts and trying to understand the, the real essence of an experience,”
“that, you know, there are things that we almost can't experience because we don't have the words to explain what we're experiencing.”
Purpose and authenticity
“Where people, again, tied to your demonic experience of happiness, where people felt that their purpose was aligned with the company's purpose, and that what they were doing each day was aligned with that purpose and, and furthering the interests of the company. they were much more motivated at work, they were much happier at work.”
“they want authenticity, in themselves and in their leaders. They detect very quickly if a leader is, or an organization is not authentic, and they want purpose, as, as I mentioned.”
“I think that what this thesis did was solidify for me my purpose, and, as I found in my interviews, people are happier when they have a purpose,”
Leadership and direct reports
“particularly that direct relationship between a, a manager or a team leader and their direct reports is crucially important. it can overshadow unhappiness with other factors of the organization or other people.”
“A leader is, is really, can be very effective in helping employees understand what their purpose is and how it aligns with the organization.”
“I think I read it somewhere that people don't leave organizations, they leave their managers.”
“many organizations, leaders kind of are just chosen from individuals within the organization, not necessarily based on leadership capability or leadership skills, but because they've either been there longest or because they're the best accountant or best engineer.”
“So while I'd like to talk immediately to CEOs and change massive organizations, I think the first entry point for me is looking at, recent managers and training them on just making them aware,”
Leading through uncertainty
“And then the one thing that really caused unhappiness across almost all the unhappy experiences that, that were described to me was uncertainty. People don't like uncertainty.”
“And so as leaders, even if there's something unpleasant, if we can be upfront about it, And honest and transparent with, with our organizations, with our employees, with our suppliers, customers, everyone, then really that can remove a lot of unhappiness.”
“how do we create some sort of island of sanity within the organization that we're working in so that people can feel valued and, and purposeful, in what they're doing?”
“showing that leaders don't, don't need to be right all the time. They don't need to have all the answers all the time. But if they can be confident that there will be a way out of this,”
“we're not certain, it could go either way, this is what we're preparing for in case it goes this way, this is what we're looking at in case it goes that way, and whatever way it goes, we will help you through it.”
Episode notes (as published)
From the episode notes published with the podcast.
A learning journey conversation with a fellow EMBA student In this episode Petro speaks to fellow UCT EMBA student, Chris Smith (Freelance Consultant in Project and Business Management). Over the past two years (2020-2021) we have been working towards our Executive MBAs through the University of Cape Town's Graduate Business School. With classes moving on-line due to the covid-19 pandemic there wasn't enough time (for me) to connect with fellow students and hear about their research projects. I decided to interview my fellow students to hear about their research. In this podcast I ask Chris about his research, which focused on improving happiness at work, what leaders can do...and why they should do it. Chris tells me more about why he chose this topic, how he did the research and what his major findings were. He also shares how this research changed him and the way he thinks about finding happiness at work. Chris found that happiness at work is not necessarily based on rewards and financial gain, but that the most dominant drivers for happiness were purpose and authenticity. He also found that leaders have an important part to play in helping their direct reports find purpose and happiness at work. Find out more about UCT's Graduate School of Business EMBA programme here: � Connect with Chris Smith � Connect with Petro � Solid Gold Podcasts
Every quotation and passage on this page is copied word for word from the episode audio transcript and linked to the moment it was said. Quotations are never written or altered by AI; topic labels, passage notes and the episode analysis are AI-generated. Guest details come from the published episode notes or the guest's own words.
Book the free 30-minute introductory conversation with Petro du Pisani